NEWS

Dedicated to providing innovative battery module PACK customized production line comprehensive solutions for various industries

Company NewsIndustry NewsProduct News

Why Manual Adhesive Application Is Still the Smart Choice for Energy Storage Battery Pack Assembly

Share:

In the rapidly growing energy storage industry, manufacturers are constantly seeking the most efficient and reliable methods to assemble battery modules and packs. As automation continues to evolve, many might assume that every step of the production process should be fully automated. However, one step in particular—adhesive application—remains widely done manually in many ESS (Energy Storage System) battery pack assembly lines.


At first glance, this may seem counterintuitive. Why choose manual operation in a field that values precision, consistency, and scale? In reality, manual adhesive application offers several distinct advantages that make it not only practical, but often the smarter choice—especially for mid-volume, flexible, or custom production setups.


Why Manual Adhesive Application Is Still the Smart Choice for Energy Storage Battery Pack Assembly

1. Unmatched Flexibility Across Diverse Product Designs

Energy storage battery modules come in a wide variety of sizes, formats, and cell configurations—especially when dealing with prismatic or large-format LFP (LiFePO₄) cells. Every project may involve a different mechanical structure, customized enclosures, or unique insulation requirements.


Automatic gluing equipment typically requires tailored jigs, fixtures, and programming for each new product model. Reconfiguring or retooling the machine can take days—or even weeks—adding both cost and lead time. Manual adhesive application, by contrast, allows operators to quickly adapt to different structures, component sizes, or layout variations with little to no downtime.



2. Precision Requirements Are Well Within Human Capability

In battery pack assembly, adhesive materials—such as insulation tapes, structural foams, or thermally conductive pads—are generally used for supporting, cushioning, or electrical insulation purposes. Unlike structural bonding in aerospace or EV battery sealing, the adhesive placement tolerance is typically around ±1–2 mm, which is well within the capabilities of a trained operator.


With proper guidance and SOPs (standard operating procedures), manual workers can achieve consistent and clean application results that meet the functional requirements of the product without the complexity and rigidity of an automated solution.



3. Lower Capital Investment and Faster Production Start-Up

Automation, while powerful, often comes with high upfront investment, integration effort, and ongoing maintenance costs. For manufacturers just entering the energy storage market—or for projects with frequently changing product designs—manual adhesive application is a cost-effective and agile approach.


It requires minimal equipment, can be deployed quickly, and doesn’t demand specialized programming or automation engineers. This makes it particularly attractive for small to medium production volumes or pilot-scale production lines.



4. Better Real-Time Quality Control and Error Handling

When adhesive tape is applied manually, the operator can immediately detect and correct issues such as tape misalignment, wrinkles, air bubbles, or debris on the surface. This real-time human feedback loop helps ensure good quality and prevents larger downstream issues.


In contrast, if an automated gluing system is misconfigured or the fixture tolerance is off, the same defect could be repeated across dozens—or even hundreds—of units before being caught, leading to significant rework or scrap loss.



5. Smooth Integration with Semi-Automated Lines

Most ESS battery pack assembly lines today are not fully automated from end to end. Many processes—like laser welding, visual inspection, module stacking, and electrical testing—are either semi-automatic or require human assistance. Manual adhesive application fits seamlessly into this hybrid production environment, without needing complex synchronization or equipment layout planning.


Moreover, because many factories are operating in limited floor space or with constrained budgets, introducing manual adhesive stations provides a balanced and scalable solution that grows with production needs.



✅ Conclusion

Manual adhesive application is far from outdated—in fact, it offers manufacturers a level of flexibility, cost control, and responsiveness that fully automated solutions often cannot match in dynamic ESS production environments. While automation remains ideal for high-volume, standardized manufacturing, manual operations continue to play a key role in ensuring quality, efficiency, and adaptability, especially in custom or fast-evolving battery pack projects.


For many energy storage system integrators and battery assembly factories, choosing manual adhesive application is not a compromise—it’s a strategic decision.


🔧 About Huiyao Laser Technology (Luoyang) Co., Ltd.

Huiyao Laser Technology (Luoyang) Co., Ltd. is a leading provider of intelligent manufacturing solutions for battery module and PACK assembly. Since our establishment in 2019, we have been committed to delivering high-performance automation equipment—including laser welding systems, semi-automatic and fully automatic assembly lines—widely used in both ESS (Energy Storage Systems) and EV (Electric Vehicle) applications.


With a growing engineering team and over 40 customized production lines delivered worldwide, Huiyao Laser continues to support our partners in achieving efficient, flexible, and scalable battery manufacturing. Whether it’s turnkey PACK assembly systems or advanced laser integration, we are dedicated to pushing the boundaries of energy storage innovation.


Latest News

Why Manual Adhesive Application Is Still the Smart Choice for Energy Storage Battery Pack Assembly

While automation dominates many areas of battery production, manual adhesive application continues to play a vital role in energy storage battery pack assembly. This article explores five key reasons—including flexibility, cost-efficiency, and better real-time control—why many manufacturers still prefer manual gluing in ESS lines.

Jun. 28, 2025

What is 3D Printing?

Jun. 25, 2025

+86 379 64321615

Customize your equipment now

WeChat